Large-scale development projects may have significant impacts towards society and the environment; therefore, the international civil society requires financial institutions to assess social and environmental impacts of the projects when providing financial support. Financial institutions often encounter social and environmental issues that are both complex and challenging, particularly with respect to projects in the emerging markets.
SMBC, as a member of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFG), assigns a high management priority to environmental issues. Our Group Environmental Policy sets out SMFG’s basic action guidelines. As the policy’s basic concept recognizing the importance of realizing a sustainable society, SMFG is making continuous efforts to harmonize environmental preservation and corporate activities, in order to support the economy and contribute to the general well-being of society as a whole.
In line with this policy, SMBC has adopted the Equator Principles in December 2005 and has established the Environment Analysis Department (EAD) within the International Banking Unit in January 2006 in order to not only ensure that the projects we finance are developed in a manner that is socially and environmentally responsible but to also fulfill SMBC's corporate social responsibility (CSR) and provide high quality financial services across the globe.
We are confident that the adoption of and the compliance with the Equator Principles will provide significant benefits to ourselves and various stakeholders such as our borrowers and local communities.
The Equator Principles are a set of guidelines developed by private financial institutions for managing social and environmental issues related to project financing. Project finance is a method of funding in which the lender looks primarily to the cashflows generated by a project as the source of repayment, and it is different from corporate finance in which the lender looks mainly to the creditability or securities of the borrower.
The Equator Principles apply to all project finance transactions with total project costs of US$10 million or more, regardless of the country and the sector. The Equator Principles are based on the social and environmental policies and guidelines of International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private sector arm of the World Bank. These policies and guidelines cover variety of issues such as social and environmental impact assessment process, pollution prevention and abatement, considerations to local communities and natural resources.
Financial institutions that adopt the Equator Principles are required to establish their own internal social and environmental guidelines and procedures in accordance with the Equator Principles, and to conduct social and environmental risk assessment.
In June 2009, SMBC joined the Equator Principles Scope Review Working Group (which considers the scope of applying the Equator Principles), and Outreach Working Group (which encourages development of the Equator Principles in developing countries.) Together with other Equator Principles financial institutions, SMBC strives to improve the content of the Equator Principles, and to reach out to financial institutions in developing countries, especially in Asia, with the purpose to promote its understanding.
As of the end of March, 2012, 76 financial institutions
have adopted the Equator Principles. For detail, please
visit the Equator Principles’ official website at
http://www.equator-principles.com
Since its establishment in January 2006, EAD has made efforts to establish its own internal procedures and has completed the Procedures for Social and Environmental Risk Assessment(Procedures). The Procedures set the internal policy and procedures for social and environmental risk assessment in accordance with the Equator Principles, and EAD has started their implementation in June 2006.
EAD is responsible for SMBC's overall operations in relation to social and environmental risk assessment for the project financing all over the world. The risk assessment process is summarized as follows:
When considering an involvement to a project that is subject to the Procedures, the lending branch will submit a Screening Form to EAD. The Screening Form is a checklist to understand the potential social and environmental impacts of the project. Based on the Screening Form and the related information, EAD categorizes the project to one of the following:
| Category |
Definition |
|---|---|
| Category A |
Projects with potential significant adverse social or environmental
impacts |
| Category B |
Projects with potential limited adverse social or environmental impacts |
| Category C |
Projects with minimal or no social or environmental impacts |
For all category A and B projects, EAD conducts an environmental review. Environmental review is done in order to confirm that the project meets the requirements for social and environmental considerations stated in the Procedures. EAD reviews all the related information of the project and, when appropriate, conducts site visits. EAD refers to its original sector checklists to prepare the Environmental Review Sheet. The Environmental Review Sheet is then forwarded to the Credit Department which becomes an important factor in the credit approval process.
For category A and B projects, social and environmental covenants are included in the financing documents in accordance with the Procedures. The lending branch and EAD monitor the client’s compliance with these covenants to ensure ongoing considerations towards social and environmental issues.
EAD has been conducting internal training to help related officers understand the established social and environmental procedures. Since EAD was established, about 780 officers including senior management, front officers, credit officers, audit officers and CSR officers have attended the training. To improve our capability on an ongoing basis, EAD issues a newsletter on a monthly basis to provide related information such as sector checklists and projects with social and environmental impacts. In addition, EAD is trying to improve and share its professional knowledge by attending seminars and holding internal sessions.
During the fiscal year of 2011 (from April 2011 to March 2012) and the fiscal year of 2010 (from April 2010 to March 2011), EAD has conducted the screening as follows (non project finance transactions included):
| Category |
Projects |
|
|---|---|---|
| FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
| Category A |
12 |
16 |
| Category B |
73 |
112 |
| Category C |
19 |
43 |
| Total |
104 |
171 |
| Sector |
Projects |
|
|---|---|---|
| FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
| Power |
41 |
51 |
| Infrastructure |
40 |
76 |
| Oil & Gas |
14 |
21 |
| Mining / Steel / Non-ferrous Metals |
5 |
14 |
| Petrochemical |
1 |
7 |
| Other |
3 |
2 |
| Total |
104 |
171 |
| Region |
Projects |
|
|---|---|---|
| FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
| Asia & Pacific |
37 |
40 |
| Europe / Middle East / Africa |
35 |
86 |
| Americas |
32 |
45 |
| Total |
104 |
171 |
| Activities |
What we have done |
|---|---|
| Establishment of internal social and environmental risk assessment process |
|
| Incorporation of social and environmental risk assessment into the business |
|
| Training and ongoing improvement |
|
| Encouragement of understanding of the Equator Principles |
|
SMBC will endeavor to realize a sustainable society through its environmental and social considerations of the projects it takes part in.